EXPOSED
This above, is presented to the Regional Prosecutor of the Court of Auditors at the Chamber to the Liguria region court against Mr:
Buccilli Gian-Luca Capurro Mayor
-Mayor Dario
-Bersanetti Stefano Councillor
Franco-Senarega Councillor
-control area manager Paola FONTANELLA Province of Genoa
-GIAMPAOLO Contact Paul Province of Genoa, the Technical Secretariat Office ATO
Roberto BENEDETTI-President and Chief Executive Alberto CORRADI Muvita
-Pres Special Waste Commission of the Province of Genoa.
the first four as mayors and aldermen of the City of Recco, the other members of bodies to monitor and control higher-level, responsible for all matters, held responsible for loss of revenue caused to that municipality and other higher-level institutions, the failure to achieve, in relation to the year 2003 -2010, the percentage of collection prescribed by the regulations applicable ratione temporis; also held responsible for damage to the reputation of the town to restore the image of tourism, trade, environmental and social communities, affected local and resonance detectable oltrecomunale by the appearance of elements of evaluation index / tabular / comparative reported by various press agencies, well as all the corporate websites of free access.
Specifically emerge:
- "a very low rate of collection for the territorial specificities which have an" ecological footprint "(see next paragraph) particularly harmful to the system environment"
- "the damage caused by the differential Failure to achieve the percentages of law "
-" the absence of any kind of project approach the values \u200b\u200bset by the standards established by the inefficiency of the mechanism of collection that would depend on the strategic weaknesses, planning, programmatic and project emerging the model of collection and recycling of waste implemented by the city of Recco himself of politico-administrative leadership. "
-" the lost revenue by way of consideration for the sale of materials collected separately (profit), comparing the income minimum potentially achievable under the law, with revenues actually accrue to the contribution from the industry consortia (through the consortium for the basin) of the material collected separately, compared product fractions to be collected "
-" the largest spending contribution to the ski definitive collection of material which does not differentiate "
-" the greatest burden capita resulting from the action subject of this Complaint "
-" the destruction of the system deployed by the previous administration (mayor Diena) which had reached very high percentages of differentiation and recycling "
-" the defacing of the landscape derived from illegal dumping dispersal in wooded areas with and without control "
-" the defacement of the urban landscape derived from the widespread dispersion near areas used for the collection of undifferentiated RU "
-" the clear and significant presence in the municipal area of \u200b\u200bexercises producers high amount of moisture (restaurants and the like) that weighs more than 38% on the total municipal never directed to the central composting "
; ; The ecological footprint
One of the most troubling aspects of our way of life today is illustrated by the concept of ecological footprint, an index expressed in hectares of land, prepared by William Rees and Mathis Wackernagel, which seeks to quantify the 'impact on the biosphere of a community (city, nation, until the whole of humanity), expressed in terms of land area per capita of biologically productive area required to supply all the energy, water and raw materials consumed and to absorb all waste produced by human activities, both as wastes, such as carbon dioxide resulting from fossil fuel use.
is an index that evolves over time depending on the consumption styles of different societies and nations.
The latest figures available are those relating to the year 2003, published in the "Living Planet Report 2006", published by WWF International, Institute of Zoology in London and Global Footprint Network.
The Ecological Footprint is compared with Biocapacity Earth, always measured in acres, which indicates the actual availability of productive terrestrial ecosystems (agricultural land, pastures, forests, fishing areas) needed to meet human needs.
The consumption of fresh water is not included in the calculation of the Ecological Footprint as the application and use of this resource can not be expressed in terms of global hectares of impact.
In fact, you can also bind to other content items of energy: that which was used for the extraction of raw materials, transport, processing, etc..
This is a higher amount of energy to heat.
So the concept of rational use of energy can also be extended to the system of waste management, by evaluating the energy savings resulting from the waste management model chosen.
It is clear the magnitude of energy savings associated with the non-production waste (100%) e al riutilizzo (~85%), da cui sorge la naturale scelta che un'amministrazione deve imporsi ed imporre al fine di dedicare ampio spazio alla Prevenzione e Riduzione dei Rifiuti Urbani, secondo le linee guida indicate nel paragrafo successivo, in accordo con le indicazioni normative richiamate in seguito.
The requirements of local
From the website of the province address:
http://www.provincia.genova.it/portal/template/viewTemplate?templateId=tixdmg8zr2_layout_14t3vw8ztc. psml indicates:
\u0026lt;
From the same site, at:
http://www.provincia.genova.it/portal/template/viewTemplate?templateId=uj4iyx9b41_layout_c5aok89b69.psml we obtain:
\u0026lt;
The province participates in the procedures defined by the DGR 7 December 1487 2007 al processo di raccolta ed accertamento dei risultati annuali di raccolta differenziata raggiunta nei Comuni della Provincia.
Infine, la Provincia di Genova ha istituito e gestisce, tramite la società controllata Muvita s.r.l., l’Osservatorio Provinciale dei Rifiuti.
Ancora dal medesimo sito, viene rilasciata la tabella che indica i dati riferibili ai fatti:
http://www.provincia.genova.it/portal/page/categoryItem?contentId=107215->fcoj3g9b56_content_muhp6d9b610
Per comodità di verifica viene qui sotto riportata integralmente l'elenco dei comuni che, alla data del 31-12-2007, avrebbero dovuto attestarsi al 40% di raccolta differenziata:....(omissis)...................
.... City RECCO pop. 10,300 t. x pop. 0.593 t.tot 5166.53 t. diff. 942.61 15.43% percentage
Regarding the aforementioned "Provincial Waste Centre" and to its positive action on the system, this organization seems set to also many other functions because of his transformation from srl "foundation".
Indeed, research on Muvita Ltd indicated by the site of the Province of Genoa (the Province of Genoa has established and manages, through its subsidiary company Muvita Ltd, the Centre Provincial Waste.) There is significant data to the following address:
http://www.provincia.genova.it/portal/template/viewTemplate?templateId=pwc4l3dsm7_layout_abfx30euy1.psml
\u0026lt;
The foundation operates in the "Education", undertake edutainment, training and dissemination activities, including management of the "Science Centre" Arenzano and promote activities of environmental education "business" through specific activities towards the "target companies", "Projects" through initiatives relating to individual themes, which may include the management of the "Door Provincial Renewable Energy and Energy Conservation" on behalf of the Province of Genoa, "Service", carrying out services supporting the activities of third parties. Muvita also manages the "Museo della Lanterna 'and' Auditorium Muvita" the following data:
Endowment Fund: € 120,000 Province Quote: 100%
President and the Administrative Law: Dr. Robert Benedetti
at Via Marconi, 165 to 16,011 Arenzano tel. 010/910001 fax 010 9100119 e-mail
segreteria@muvita.it site: www.muvita.it
; ; The preventive education
's still the province of Genoa. Higher-level body to the town of Recco, which provides information and locations at:
http://www.provincia.genova.it/servlets/resources?contentId=125624&resourceName=Allegato-pdf
pinpointing " PLAN FOR THE PREVENTION AND WASTE REDUCTION IN THE TERRITORY OF THE PROVINCE OF GENOA "reads:
\u0026lt;
True preventive strategy is thus to unify this linear path so as to minimize the recourse to contribution to the collection circuit of the UK and, consequently, the use of new resources for new goods. This is an essential complement to strategies that seek to develop a closed loop with the reuse of waste - or its transformation into secondary raw materials.
The concept of prevention can be applied only at the stage of waste (prevention at source) and the final stage of landfill or incineration (the term minimization is then used). The field of use of waste through its reuse as an integrated product or as a secondary raw material is certainly a better solution than simply disposal, but we must always remember that "the refusal is better than that was not produced. " Prevention at source is that justifies special attention and priority.
The concept of "prevention at source" you can make a distinction in order of importance: you may prefer a "non-production" for the refusal, or opt for his "reduction or partial reduction." We think the purchase of fruit weight than pre-packaged (albeit with eco-friendly packaging), mechanical watches
compared to those with button cells, prevention of in municipal waste tends to approach the policy of "eco products" while also account of the growth Economic towards the consumption of natural resources.
We highlight these issues by putting the eco-consumer and a top priority to develop the consumption of services and products to meet basic needs and
improve the quality of life, while simultaneously restricting the use of resources natural, hazardous substances and pollutants to avoid jeopardizing the satisfaction of the needs of future generations also.
The "dematerialize" or the use of fewer resources, while still having the objective of arriving at the same level of welfare, is part of this logic ecoconsumo.>>
; The reference to general legal
Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament published in the Official Journal of the European Union reiterates its art 11/22/2008. 4 "The waste hierarchy" and defines that "hierarchy is applied as a priority order of law and policy on the prevention and waste management:
the Directive stipulates that the European Commission submitted to Parliament the report with measures to support the prevention and in particular:
a) "before the end of 2011, an interim report on trends in waste production and the scope of waste prevention including the definition of a policy planning ecologica dei prodotti che riduca al contempo la produzione di rifiuti e la presenza di sostanze nocive in essi (…).
b) entro la fine del 2011, la formulazione di un piano d’azione per ulteriori misure di sostegno a livello europeo volte in particolare, a modificare gli attuali modelli di consumo;
c) entro la fine del 2014 la definizione di obiettivi in materia di prevenzione dei rifiuti e di dissociazione per il 2020, basati sulle migliori prassi disponibili (…)”
L’articolo 29 ha per titolo “Programmi di prevenzione dei rifiuti” e prescrive che gli stati membri adottino dei programmi di prevenzione dei rifiuti entro il 12 dicembre 2013 e che tali piani identifichino clearly the measures of waste prevention. These plans should set targets and to this fact, the Directive provides a framework that can be attached as an example. The directive is clear that "The purpose of these objectives and measures is to decouple economic growth from environmental impacts associated with the generation of waste."
Article 29 paragraph 5, the Directive stipulates that "The commission shall create a system for the information exchange on best practices on waste prevention and develop guidelines to assist Member States in preparing programs. "
Le precedenti direttive.
Nelle precedenti direttive gli orientamenti erano analoghi, però la definizione di “prevenzione” non era molto precisa, se non per quanto riguarda gli imballaggi (ai sensi della Direttiva europea 1994/62 recepita prima dal Dlgs 22/97 e poi dal Dlgs 152/061).
Nelle direttive precedenti venivano definite le priorità e gli obiettivi della politica ambientale europea fino al 2050 descrivendo in modo particolareggiato i provvedimenti da adottare per contribuire alla realizzazione della strategia europea in materia di sviluppo sostenibile.
Il ruolo della Unione Europea è quindi quello di contribuire alla prevenzione dei rifiuti e di promuovere il riciclaggio informing consumers, by supporting research and technological development of new materials to promote environmental protection and the means to deliver products using fewer resources.>> embankment then
:
-that Community law ( following the Treaty of Lisbon, or European Union law) requires Member States to take all necessary measures "to ensure that waste is recovered or disposed of without endangering human health and without using processes or methods that could harm the environment " and" to prohibit the abandonment, dumping or uncontrolled disposal of waste (Article 4 of Council Directive of 18 March 1991 No. 91/156/EEC), which
-service waste management involves "the collection, transport, recovery and disposal of waste, including the supervision of such operations "(Article 1 dir. 91/156/EEC, cited above);
-that" Member States shall establish or designate the authority or authorities competent to implement the provisions of this Directive ( art. 6 dir. 91/156/EEC, cited above);
-that the "competent authorities referred to in art. 6 should develop [...] one or more waste management plans, covering [...] the type, quantity and origin of waste to be recovered or disposed "(art. 7, dir. 91/156/EEC, cited above);
-Annex II to Directive 91/156/EEC, cited above, indicates recovery operations, in accordance with Art. 4, must take place " without endangering human health and without using processes or methods which could harm the environment "
Also:
-the deadline for transposition of Directive 91/156 / EEC, cited above, expired April 10, 1993 (Article 2, 91/156/EEC, cited above);
-that in the administrative head of the junta in Diena (formerly citata), dunque anteriore alle due aventi sindaco Buccilli ed alla attuale avente sindaco Capurro, il valore di differenziata raggiunto era estremamente alto e di molto superiore all'attuale;
-che l’art. 24 del d.lgs. 5 febbraio 1997, n. 22 (c.d. “decreto Ronchi”), ha imposto ai Comuni (enti titolari dei poteri in materia di raccolta differenziata ai sensi dei precedenti art. 21, comma 2, lett. c), e 23, comma 3, del predetto decreto) di conseguire percentuali minime di raccolta differenziata fissate in percentuali progressivamente crescenti fino a raggiungere quella del 35% a partire dal 2003 (il menzionato art. 24 statuisce che “In ogni ambito territoriale ottimale deve essere assicurata una raccolta differenziata municipal waste equivalent to the following minimum percentages of waste: 15% within two years from the date of entry into force of this Decree and 25% within four years from the date of entry into force of this decree, 35% from the sixth year after the date of entry into force of this decree ");
-the art. 205 of Legislative Decree no. April 3, 2006, No 152, caused an increase in the percentage shares to be realized in subsequent years (the first paragraph provides that "In any geographical area should be ensured optimal sorting of waste equivalent to the following minimum percentages of waste: the least-
Thirty-five percent by December 31, 2006;
-
least forty-five percent by December 31, 2008;
- least sixty-five percent later than December 31, 2012), further revised percentages art. 1, paragraph 1108, of 27 December 2009, n. 296 ("In order to achieve significant cost savings and a more efficient utilization of financial resources for the management of municipal solid waste, the region, after formal notice, it can provide through an acta commissioner to ensure government-wide waste management water distribution in relation to those areas within which local optimum is not assured separate collection of waste equivalent to the following minimum percentages:
-at least 40 percent by December 31, 2007;
- at least 50 percent by December 31, 2009 ;
-at least 60 percent by December 31, 2011);
- these provisions should be recognized that the effective binding preceptive since:
they ensure the principle of prevention, precaution and preventive action is widely recognized in environmental matters by the Court of guidelines on justice pronunciatasi waste (inter plures C. Giusti., 11 November 2004, C-457/02, Niselli that "the aim of Directive 75/442 [...] is the protection of human health and the environment against the adverse effects of collecting, transporting, processing, storage and waste " to be implemented "in the light of Article. 174, No 2 EC, which states that Community policy on the environment at a high level of protection and is based in particular on the principles of precaution and preventive action (see, inter alia, 18 April 2002, Case C- 9 / 00, Palin Granit and Vehmassalon kansanterveystyön kuntayhtymän hallitus ECR. I-3533, 'the ruling Palin Granit», punti 22 e 23)”; sui principi di precauzione e prevenzione in materia ambientale, più di recente, C. giust., 9 marzo 2010, C-379/08 e 380/08, Raffinerie mediterranee); si attuano numerose direttive in materia di rifiuti che hanno imposto agli Stati membri di porre in essere tutte le misure idonee ad implementare un’efficace gestione dei rifiuti tesa essenzialmente alla protezione della salute umana e dell’ambiente, favorendo il recupero dei rifiuti e l’utilizzazione dei materiali di recupero come materie prime per preservare le risorse naturali nonché provvedendo in modo responsabile allo smaltimento ed al recupero dei rifiuti (dir. 75/442/CEE, come modificata ed integrata dalle dir. 91/156/CEE, dir. 91/692/CEE, dir. 96/350/CEE, poi consolidate nella direttiva 5 aprile 2006, n. 12/2006/CE, la quale ha ribadito nuovamente gli obblighi europei di procedere al “recupero dei rifiuti mediante riciclo, reimpiego, riutilizzo o ogni altra azione intesa a ottenere materie prime secondarie” art. 3, par. 1, lett. b), nonché ad “assicurare che i rifiuti siano recuperati senza pericolo”, art. 4); la Corte di giustizia, pronunciandosi all’esito di una procedura di infrazione (C. giust., sent. 4 marzo 2010, C-297/08, Commissione c. Italia), ha già riconosciuto che l’Italia è venuta meno agli obblighi di diritto comunitario su di essa incombenti, nella parte in cui non ha adottato, “misure necessarie per assicurare che i rifiuti siano recuperati o smaltiti senza pericolo per la salute dell’uomo e senza recare pregiudizio all’ambiente” (così il dispositivo di condanna), inadempimento che è stato determinato anche dal basso livello di raccolta differenziata; come riconosciuto dalla giurisprudenza costituzionale, compete allo Stato, anche all’indomani della riforma del Titolo V della Costituzione, fissare un livello di tutela ambientale uniforme a livello nazionale ed inderogabile da parte delle Autonomie (“La disciplina statale dei rifiuti, collocandosi nell’ambito della “tutela dell’ambiente e dell’ecosistema” – di competenza esclusiva statale ai sensi dell’art. 117, secondo comma, lettera s), Cost. – costituisce, anche in attuazione degli obblighi comunitari, un livello di tutela uniforme e si impone sull’intero territorio nazionale, come un limite alla disciplina che le Regioni e le Province autonome dettano in altre materie di loro competenza, per evitare che esse deroghino al livello di tutela ambientale stabilito dallo Stato, ovvero lo peggiorino (sentenze n. 62 del 2008 e n. 378 del 2007). Resta, peraltro, ferma la competenza delle Regioni per la cura di interessi funzionalmente collegati con quelli propriamente ambientali: infatti, anche nel settore dei rifiuti, accanto ad interessi inerenti in via primaria alla tutela dell’ambiente, vengono in rilievo altre materie, state for which the jurisdiction does not preclude the concomitant possibility for regions to act, obviously respecting the uniform levels of protection provided by the State (most recently, Case No. 249 of 2009), "C. cost., December 4, 2009, No 314, paragraph 2.2.) Domestic legislation be interpreted in the light of Community law to ensure the so-called "effectiveness" (C. right., 5 February 1963, C-26/62, Van Gend en Loos); in this regard can not fail to point out that EU law legislation imposes an obligation on the part of states to implement collection systems with recovery of recyclables, not contemplate or authorize systems, such as the national one, founded shares on progressive approach to the full extent of the waste produced in the territory, that that can not be concluded that at least the percentage shares set by the national legislature have an immediate prescriptive value, both to protect the environment and public health (on the instrumentality system of collection, disposal and recycling to the protection of those interests C. Giusti., sent. March 4, 2010, C-297/08, Commission v. Italy), both in the interests of taxpaying citizens (think of that paragraph Article 3. Leg 205. April 3, 2006, No. 152, having set the first paragraph of the shares of the annual collection, introduces an additional burden to local communities municipal which is attributable to the deviation, "Where in water distribution are not met the minimum goals set out in this Article shall apply an additional twenty percent of the charge transfer of a load of waste to landfill ' Area Authorities created by Article 3, paragraph 24 of the Law of 28 December 1995, n. 549, which distributes the burden among those municipalities in its territory who have not reached the percentages referred to in paragraph 1 based on the collection of fees achieved in individual municipalities ") that the powers of the order of the Special Commissioner (possibly responsible) can not determine a level of protection of those interests lower than the national legislation implementing Community law, legitimizing the collection rate levels lower than those established by national legislation (such interpretation is in sharp contrast to outline the goals and objectives that govern the establishment, exercise the powers and commissarial use of resources and, above all, with the Community law, such that, any provision that describes the content presented or produced called the reductive effect should be disregarded).
Conclusion dell'esposto
As the narrative that precedes it becomes necessary to acquire
- official information and data relating to the collection within the territory of the town of Recco from 1999 to 2009, information which has to have regard both to the overall figure of that collection, both referring to that specific segment of the wet fraction representing a share dominant.
- information and official data on the profitability of the collection of the different fractions, and a reasonable estimate of the likely revenue gains from the above collection to the final calculation of damages.
- all acts of investigation, preliminary and deliberations of the council and the board of the City of Recco, thesis the organization of waste collection service (with specific reference to that of the wet fraction) occurred through the different companies delegated to the service, specifically with regard to those contemplating the obligations of the same reach of the shares of recycling required by law.
Considering
- that art. 206-bis of Legislative Decree. April 3, 2006, No 152, establishes the National Waste Department of the Environment and the protection of land and sea, equipped with information functions, coordination and supervision in the field of waste collection, recycling and waste disposal;
- that, as it no longer cd "Sindacatorio power" lies with the prosecution to determine whether to extend the action of loss of revenue, experienced the bodies with responsibilities of initiative, drive and draft, but the City Council and therefore all the directors, because the final decision-making powers organ on the organization of public services, local art. 42 Leg. August 18, 2000, No 267 (the matter was already covered by art. 32 Lett. A) and f) Law of 8 June 1990, n. 142, which, for present purposes, the powers entrusted to the Council on the establishment of special agencies including the approval of the relevant statutes), subject to the freedom of final assessment of Requested the Court to recognize the significance commissi activity or omission of the Council. Viewed
again
- art. 14 rd August 13, 1933, No 1038, under which the Court of Auditors may request the administration and order the parties to produce documents and documents that he believes necessary for the resolution of the dispute, the period within which compliance instructors must be carried out;
- art. 16, paragraph 3, dl May 13, 1991, No 152, conv. into law July 12, 1991, No 203, which provides that "The Court of Auditors in the exercise of its powers may, even by the Guardia di Finanza, inspections and investigations directed at the government and third-party contractors or recipients of financial providence for specific purposes;
- art. 2, paragraph 4, dl November 15, 1993, No 453, conv. into law January 14, 1994, No 19, laying down rules on jurisdiction and control of the Court of Auditors, which states that "the Court of Auditors, for the exercise of its powers, obligations instructors may also delegate to government officials and make use of expert witnesses in relation the provisions of Article 73 of Legislative Decree 28 July 1989, No 271 ";
Association member, requires the prosecutor addressed this exposed the initiation of a procedure to define the loss of revenue that appalesa be of significant value, (because of a high differential) and the apparent continuation of that loss, in the years to follow, for the aforementioned lack of effort to implement an effective waste management aimed primarily at protecting human health and the environment, promoting the recovery of waste and the use of recycled materials as raw materials to conserve natural resources, as required by the rules, ensuring:
-cited over the years if the council has imposed on various companies responsible for a clear, specific and accurate in order to achieve the percentage of recycling required by law;
-if the same company has been indicated in a particular location is particularly aimed at implementing significant fraction moist
-if the measures have been prepared for the organization of separate collection of waste (including where the acts of inquiry, preliminary expectations and deliberative constitution and the contracted companies, specifically with regard to those contemplating the technical-legal (terms of service contract, administrative or service, other similar acts, etc..) which is been imposed, the municipal administrative structure required to meet quotas collection rates differenziata sancite dalla legge.
ORAS
f.to il coordinatore
0 comments:
Post a Comment