Ida beams
I made a personal choice, and meditated a lot '. I then signed: I intended this signature as a call to all women, all women without distinction, an appeal on behalf of female subjectivity denied. Let the case: all of this chaos is based on a continued denial is based on NOT! not offended anyone, not you invite anybody, nobody sex, is no minor, no did this, nobody said that ... who is this general NO that encompasses all and everything? this person who is denied, what is it? ... more PARTY DENIED that! ... It 's against the absolute rule that mentality where nothing and that I signed. I signed against this is NOT overpowering, annihilating, compulsively, against that nothing and no one denies that the root of the female subject in his freedom.
This NOT declined in various forms is the problem subjective and political spread to all sides. ... Is not that clearly defines the gap even more opposed to his total.
I did not sign then a man or A political party, nor I signed against girls called in question, we'll miss ... There is a way and so on ... what, then where would the good girls , where they would be bad? We are still there? I believe that even a single signature, a mere presence, could reopen the question of female subjectivity, making it visible to another level ... We know that will not do, that does not end here ... so much progress has been made, but a lot of other road remains to be done ... I know it's risky, but a bit 'of risk, after all this crap, you can also consciously run ... If we are waiting to awaken men awake, what can we say? I at least, given the age, I have no hope of seeing a light.
0 comments:
Post a Comment